(PC) Ramos v. Corsaletti
Plaintiff: Frank Ramos
Defendant: Corsaletti
Case Number: 2:2024cv01890
Filed: July 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dennis M Cota
Referring Judge: Troy L Nunley
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER and FINDING and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 8/27/24 ORDERING that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a District Judge to this case. This case has been ASSIGNED to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. The new case number is 2:24-cv-01890-TLN-DMC (PC). It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. Matter REFERRED to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. (Salmeron, A)
August 28, 2024 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on Frank Ramos. (Salmeron, A)
July 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kyono, V)
July 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/11/2024 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with the required certified copy of his trust account statement, or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (Huang, H)
July 12, 2024 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP Application served on Frank Ramos. (Huang, H)
July 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *7/8/2024*. Consent or Decline due by 8/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Woodson, A)
July 10, 2024 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY EMAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Frank Ramos. (Woodson, A)
July 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Corsaletti by Frank Ramos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Woodson, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Ramos v. Corsaletti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corsaletti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank Ramos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?