Packard v CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
| Joshua David Packard |
| Longs Drug Stores California, LLC and CVS Pharmacy, Inc. |
| 2:2024cv02286 |
| August 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Daniel J Calabretta |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand by CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Longs Drug Stores California, LLC. (Aalem, Arash) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #2 New Case Documents by CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Longs Drug Stores California, LLC. (Aalem, Arash) Modified on 8/28/2024 (Licea Chavez, V). |
| Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Aalem, Arash) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Lopez, K) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Nevada County Superior Court, case number CU0001431 by All Defendants. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11707521) (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Record) (Aalem, Arash) . |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
