(PS) Singh v. City of Elk Grove et al
| Raj Singh |
| Trudau, City of Elk Grove and Bobby Davis |
| 2:2024cv02455 |
| September 10, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
OBJECTIONS to #3 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Plaintiff Raj Singh. (Kyono, V)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/18/2024 GRANTING #2 Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Further, it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Complaint #1 be dismissed without leave to amend for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to these F&Rs due within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order, served on Raj Singh. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Raj Singh. (Nair, C)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Raj Singh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Nair, C)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Nair, C)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
