(HC) Foster v. Ramirez et al
Petitioner: DeEarl Foster
Respondent: Aldana Ramirez and Sacramento District Attorney Office
Case Number: 2:2024cv02800
Filed: October 11, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Referring Judge: William B Shubb
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2024 Opinion or Order RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and ifp form re-served on DeEarl Foster at HDSP per chambers request (pursuant to CDCR locator inmate is still at facility). (Yin, K)
November 25, 2024 Opinion or Order MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Not in Custody: #3 Order sent to DeEarl Foster. Notice of Change of Address due by 2/3/2025. (Kyono, V)
October 31, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Senior District Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The new case number is: 2:24-cv-02800 WBS AC (HC). (Kyono, V)
October 31, 2024 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on DeEarl Foster. (Kyono, V)
October 30, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kyono, V)
October 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/28/2024 DIRECTING Petitioner to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee within 30 days. (Spichka, K.)
October 29, 2024 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP Application served on DeEarl Foster. (Spichka, K.)
October 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 11/18/2024. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Mendez Licea, O)
October 16, 2024 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on DeEarl Foster. (Mendez Licea, O)
October 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Aldana Ramirez, Sacramento District Attorney Office by DeEarl Foster. (Mendez Licea, O)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Foster v. Ramirez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DeEarl Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Aldana Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sacramento District Attorney Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?