Melgoza v. City of Woodland et al
| Cristian Melgoza |
| City of Woodland and Victor Martinez |
| 2:2024cv03410 |
| December 6, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dena M Coggins |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER with Jury Demand by City of Woodland, Victor Martinez. Attorney Bittner, William added.(Bittner, William) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION for 28-Day Extension for Defendants' Response to Complaint by City of Woodland, Victor Martinez. Attorney Kilday, Bruce Alan added. (Kilday, Bruce) Modified on 1/2/2025 (OML). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: City of Woodland served on 12/11/2024, answer due 1/2/2025. (Clarke, Ty) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Joint Status Report Filing Deadline: 3/24/2025 (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Woodland, Victor Martinez* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Ty Clarke* *Pointer & Buelna, LLP* *155 Filbert Street, Suite 208* *Oakland, CA 94607*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Cristian Melgoza. Attorney Clarke, Ty added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11911148) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Clarke, Ty) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
