USA v. Approx. $73,212.71, et al.,
United States of America |
Approximately $73,212.71 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009403, Approximately $13,738.24 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009438, Approximately $1,378,783.42 seized from UBS AG account number GE 46907, Approximately $177,373.94 seized from UBS AG account number GE 52005, Approximately $162,747.67 seized from UBS AG account number GE 52140, Approximately $256,401.37 seized from UBS AG account number GE 53224, Approximately $165,973.61 seized from UBS AG account number GE 52285, Approximately $420,006.99 seized from UBS AG account number GE 49584, Approximately $172,094.56 seized from UBS AG account number GE 49595, Approximately $246,917.35 seized from UBS AG account number GE 53810 and Approximately $255,662.78 seized from UBS AG account number GE 51848 |
Run It Up, Inc. and Won It All, Inc. |
2:2024mc00204 |
May 17, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Allison Claire |
Dale A Drozd |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED Forfeiture. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 1 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time for Filing a Complaint for Forfeiture and/or to Obtain an Indictment Alleging Forfeiture by United States of America. Attorney Khasigian, Kevin Christopher added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Khasigian, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.