T.I v. Elk Grove Unified School District et al
Plaintiff: T.I
Defendant: Elk Grove Unified School District and David Carroll
Case Number: 2:2025cv00520
Filed: February 13, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale A Drozd
Referring Judge: Jeremy D Peterson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2025 Filing 7 AMENDED CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/23/2025 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Deputy Clerk JJD)
February 20, 2025 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to the 4 Minute Order Reassigning Case, this action is Randomly REASSIGNED to District Judge Dale A. Drozd for all further proceedings. District Judge John A. Mendez is no longer associated with this case. The case number on all future filed documents shall be: 2:25-cv-0520 DAD JDP. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Deputy Clerk JJD)
February 20, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Krithi Basu on behalf of T.I. Attorney Basu, Krithi added. (Basu, Krithi)
February 20, 2025 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for Senior District Judge John A. Mendez on 02/20/2025: On the Court's own motion and pursuant to the senior status of District Judge John A. Mendez, the Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to reassign this case to another district judge for all further proceedings. Any hearing dates and deadlines previously set in this matter are VACATED. (cc: Sac. Operations Supervisor) (Deputy Clerk MDY)
February 14, 2025 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Deputy Clerk VLC)
February 14, 2025 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *David Carroll, Elk Grove Unified School District* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *John L. Burris* *Law Offices of John L. Burris* *7677 Oakport Street Suite 1120* *Oakland, CA 94621*. (Deputy Clerk VLC)
February 13, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Carroll, Elk Grove Unified School District by T.I. Attorney Burris, John L. added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-12040567) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet )(Burris, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: T.I v. Elk Grove Unified School District et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: T.I
Represented By: John L. Burris
Represented By: Krithi Basu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elk Grove Unified School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?