(PS) Singh v. Rawat et al
| Raj Singh |
| Kiran Rawat, Trudau, Bobby Davis and City of Elk Grove |
| 2:2025cv02401 |
| August 22, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dena M Coggins |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
OBJECTIONS to #3 Findings and Recommendations by Raj Singh. (Deputy Clerk AMW)
|
|
Filing 3
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/24/2025 RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Dena M. Coggins. Objections to these Findings and Recommendations due within 14 days. (Deputy Clerk LMS)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Findings and Recommendations, served on Raj Singh. (Deputy Clerk LMS)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Raj Singh. (Deputy Clerk OML)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against City of Elk Grove, Bobby Davis, Kiran Rawat, Trudau by Raj Singh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Deputy Clerk OML)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Deputy Clerk OML)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
