(SS) Lucero v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Ruby Lucero
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2025cv03250
Filed: November 9, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Chi Soo Kim
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 04/23/26 AWARDING Plaintiff fees and expenses in the amount $5,918.73. (Deputy Clerk KML)
April 21, 2026 Filing 14 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Award and Payment of Attorney Fees pursuant to Equal Access to Justice Act by Ruby Lucero (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Statement of Services, #3 Retainer Agreement) (Lehrkind, Margaret) Modified on 4/22/2026 (OML).
March 25, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 13 JUDGMENT dated *3/25/2026* pursuant to order signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 3/25/2026. (Deputy Clerk RRB)
March 25, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 3/25/2026 REMANDING this action to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk RRB)
March 20, 2026 Filing 11 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER Vol. Remand by Commissioner of Social Security. (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar)
March 4, 2026 Filing 10 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Ruby Lucero. (Lehrkind, Margaret)
February 2, 2026 Filing 9 NOTICE OF LODGING SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSCRIPT IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT by Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney Olsen, Edward Alan added. (Attachments: #1 Complete Certified Administrative Record)(Olsen, Edward)
December 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) signed by Chief Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/12/2025, Nunc Pro Tunc 12/11/2025: All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). Accordingly, this Court AUTHORIZES the action to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. All further papers filed in this action shall bear the case number 2:25-cv-03250-CSK. (Deputy Clerk LMS)
December 11, 2025 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar)
December 9, 2025 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Lehrkind, Margaret)
December 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 3/12/2026. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk KML)
December 8, 2025 Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Margaret Lehrkind* *Lehrkind Law Office* *2625 Alcatraz Ave, #208* *Berkeley, CA 94705-2756*. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Deputy Clerk KML)
December 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 12/05/25 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING E-Service on the Commissioner of Social Security. The Clerk shall issue a summons and serve this order, summons and complaint on the Commissioner of Social Security. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Deputy Clerk KML)
November 10, 2025 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Deputy Clerk OML)
November 9, 2025 Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Ruby Lucero. (Lehrkind, Margaret)
November 9, 2025 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Ruby Lucero. Attorney Lehrkind, Margaret added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lehrkind, Margaret)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (SS) Lucero v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ruby Lucero
Represented By: Margaret Lehrkind
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service
Represented By: Social Security Admin- SS E-Service
Represented By: Oscar Gonzalez de Llano, GOVT
Represented By: Edward Alan Olsen, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?