(SS) Gulick v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Stacey Gulick
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2026cv01410
Filed: April 8, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Daniel J Calabretta
Referring Judge: Dennis M Cota
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2026 Filing 8 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Margaret Branick-Abilla for Commissioner of Social Security (Branick-Abilla, Margaret)
April 15, 2026 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta and Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. The new case number is: 2:26-cv-01410-DJC-DMC. (Deputy Clerk LMS)
April 10, 2026 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous)
April 10, 2026 Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security*. Response to complaint to be served on *Francesco Paulo Benavides* *Law Offices of Francesco Benavides* *1990 N. California Blvd., 8th Floor* *Walnut Creek, CA 94596*. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Deputy Clerk JAW)
April 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 7/13/2026. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Deputy Clerk JAW)
April 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 4/9/26 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING E-Service on the Commissioner of Social Security. The Clerk shall issue a summons and serve this order, summons, complaint and Scheduling Order on the Commissioner of Social Security. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Deputy Clerk JAW)
April 8, 2026 Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Stacey Gulick. (Benavides, Francesco)
April 8, 2026 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Stacey Gulick. Attorney Benavides, Francesco Paulo added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Benavides, Francesco)
April 8, 2026 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Deputy Clerk KEZ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (SS) Gulick v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacey Gulick
Represented By: Francesco Paulo Benavides
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service
Represented By: Social Security Admin- SS E-Service
Represented By: Margaret Branick-Abilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?