(PS) Perechesov et al v. Blanche, et al
| Denis Perechesov and Anastasiia Chistanova |
| Todd Blanche, Daren K. Margolin and Garry D. Malphrus |
| 2:2026cv02400 |
| July 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dena M Coggins |
| Chi Soo Kim |
| Prison Conditions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Todd Blanche, Garry D. Malphrus, Daren K. Margolin*. Response to complaint to be served on *Denis Perechesov* *2616 Benny Way* *Rancho Cordova, CA 95670*. (Deputy Clerk VLC) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk VLC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for EXPEDITED Consideration by Anastasiia Chistanova, Denis Perechesov. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Deputy Clerk VLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Todd Blanche, Garry D. Malphrus, Daren K. Margolin by Denis Perechesov, Anastasiia Chistanova. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Deputy Clerk VLC) |
| RECEIPT number 200019965 for $405.00 for Filing Fee from Anastasia Chistanova. (Deputy Clerk VLC) |
| SERVICE AT COUNTER: #3 Civil New Case Documents, #4 Summons served on Anastasiia Chistanova, Denis Perechesov. (Deputy Clerk VLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
