(PC) Osuna v. State of CA, et al
| Jamie Osuna |
| State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), Office of Internal Affairs (OIA), Allegation Inquiry Management Section (AIMS), Angel Alex Duran, Tammy Campbell, Ryan Silva, R. Broomfield, Sarah Gates, Hector Ferrel, Crescent Cavanaugh, Erik Beam, R. Espin, Hamilton, Gomez, Aguilar, A. Guerrero, J. Gutierrez, Pena and Art Guillen |
| 2:2026cv03023 |
| September 3, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Chi Soo Kim |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 10/13/2026. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk AJB) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Removing Defendants. (Rhoan, Erick) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 25CV017927 by Defendants Broomfield, Cavanaugh, Espino, Gates, Guillen, Pena, Silva, and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (also erroneously sued as the Allegation Inquiry Management Section, Office of Internal Affairs, and State of California). (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-13825909) (Rhoan, Erick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
