McKinney v. Law Office of James Duncan et al
James William McKinney |
Law Office of James Duncan, David Eyster and Peyman Hedayati |
1:2009cv02605 |
February 19, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Eureka Office |
Nandor J. Vadas |
Constitutional - State Statute |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 Certificate of Service by Mail re: Docket No. 29. (cmw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2010) |
Filing 29 ORDER by Judge Nandor J. Vadas Granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 4 and 23 . Terminating Plaintiff's Opposition to the Dismissal, inadvertently filed as 28 Motion Not To Dismiss The Complaint. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2010) |
Filing 16 ORDER Setting Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 9/15/09. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2009) |
Filing 14 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO EUREKA DIVISION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 8/17/2009. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2009) |
Filing 7 ORDER FOR DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY re 4 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1)(4)(5)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Affidavits in Support Thereof MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1)(4)(5)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Affidavits in Support Thereof filed by Law Office of James Duncan. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 8/3/2009. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.