Westfall v. City of Crescent City, The et al
Donna Westfall |
City of Crescent City, The, Kelly Schellong, Dennis Burns, Charles Slert and Kathryn Murray |
1:2010cv05222 |
November 17, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Eureka Office |
Alameda |
Nandor J. Vadas |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 ORDER by Judge Nandor J. Vadas granting 49 Motion to Dismiss; granting 50 Motion to Strike (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2011) |
Filing 38 ORDER by Judge Nandor J. Vadas Granting 22 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, and Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendants' Anti-SLAPP Motion to Strike. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days to file a Secon d Amended Complaint. Within seven (7) days, Defendants are instructed to file a supplemental brief limited to whether and when notice of their motion to strike was provided. Defendants must file their request for attorneys' fees and costs with in fourteen (14) days. Plaintiff may file her response to Defendants' request within seven (7) days of the service of Defendants' request. No reply will be permitted. Terminating 12 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the original complaint. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2011) |
Filing 17 ORDER Case Management Conference set for March 15, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. Joint statement due March 8, 2011.. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 12/14/10. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.