Irwin et al v. Washington Mutual Bank et al
William S. Irwin and Pamela G. Irwin |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Washington Mutual Bank |
1:2011cv06341 |
December 15, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Eureka Office |
Lake |
Nandor J. Vadas |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER re 16 Order to Show Cause discharging Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Nandor J Vadas on 5/1/12. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012) |
Filing 24 ORDER re 20 MOTION to appear telephonically at motion to dismiss hearing filed by Pamela G. Irwin, William S. Irwin. Signed by Judge Nandor J Vadas on 4/25/12. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2012) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting re 18 MOTION to Appear by Telephone at 5/15/12 Hearing re Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Washington Mutual Bank. Signed by Judge Nandor J Vadas on 4/6/12. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2012) |
Filing 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re failure to appear. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 5/1/2012 at 01:30 PM.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 4/4/12. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2012) |
Filing 13 ORDER re 12 MOTION to Appear by Telephone filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Washington Mutual Bank. TELEPHONE APPEARANCE INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDED IN ORDER Signed by Judge Nandor J Vadas on 3/28/12. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.