Morshed v. County of Lake, California
Plaintiff: Michael D. Morshed
Defendant: County of Lake, California
Case Number: 1:2013cv00521
Filed: February 6, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Nandor J. Vadas
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 201 ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE DATE. Compliance Hearing set for 8/29/2014 is CONTINUED to 9/12/2014 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/26/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2014)
June 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 199 ORDER VACATING DATES AND SETTING COMPLIANCE DATE IN LIGHT OF NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. Compliance Hearing is set for Friday, 8/29/2014 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/6/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2014)
June 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 191 Discovery Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on June 3, 2014. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2014)
May 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 187 PRETRIAL ORDER NO.2 by Judge YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS denying 118 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 119 Motion in Limine; denying 120 Motion in Limine; granting 121 Motion in Limine; granting 122 Motion in Limine; denying 123 Motion in Limine; granting 124 Motion in Limine; denying 126 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 127 Motion in Limine; granting 128 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 129 Motion in Limine; denying 130 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 131 Motion in Limine; denying 132 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 133 Motion in Limine; granting 134 Motion in Limine; granting 136 Motion in Limine; denying 137 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 138 Motion in Limine (ygrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2014)
May 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 117 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting in part and denying in part 62 Motion for Summary Judgment (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2014)
April 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers; denying Motions to seal the documents filed a Dkt. Nos. 44-60; denying 44 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 81 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 82 Administrative Mot ion to File Under Seal; denying 84 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 85 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 86 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 87 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 92 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 94 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2014)
April 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion to Compel; denying 42 Motion for Attorney Fees (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2014)
January 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 40 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2014)
November 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting in part 29 Ex Parte Application to Modify Case Management and Pretrial Order. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2013)
August 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 23 Order on Stipulation re Protective Order filed by County of Lake, California, Michael D. Morshed. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/30/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2013)
August 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER Case referred to mediation. Amended Pleadings due by 7/31/2013. Discovery due by 12/20/2013. Joinder of Parties due by 7/31/2013. Motions due by 2/25/2014. Jury Selection/trial set for 6/9/2014 08:30 AM. Pr etrial Conference set for 5/23/2014 09:00 AM; Compliance Hearing set for 5/2/2014 09:01 AM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/2/13. (kk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2013)
July 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE AND NOTICE OF TENTATIVE CASE MANAGEMENT PRETRIAL ORDER. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/15/2013 is CONTINUED to Monday, 7/22/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/11/2013. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morshed v. County of Lake, California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael D. Morshed
Represented By: Jocelyn Burton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Lake, California
Represented By: John Robert Whitefleet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?