Smith v. The State of California Department of Highway Patrol
Plaintiff: Nicole Summer Smith
Defendant: The State of California Department of Highway Patrol
Case Number: 1:2013cv01341
Filed: March 25, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Mendocino
Presiding Judge: William Alsup
Presiding Judge: Nandor J. Vadas
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 133 SPECIAL VERDICT FORM. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2015)
March 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 122 PRELIMINARY JURY INSTRUTIONS. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2015)
March 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 121 Supplemental Preliminary Jury Instruction Re Jury Questions to Witnesses. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2015)
March 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 112 Amended Pretrial Order. Signed by Judge James Donato on 3/16/15. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2015)
March 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 109 PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge James Donato on 3/12/15. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2015)
March 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 104 VOIR DIRE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 3/9/2015. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2015)
March 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER granting Plaintiff Nicole Smith and Defendant's legal counsel Jolie Poper to telephonically appear at the 3/12/15 settlement conference by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2015)
February 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 96 NOTICE of Further Settlement Conference and Settlement Conference Order by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. A further settlement conference is set for 3/12/2015 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco.(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2015)
December 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 71 Order by Hon. James Donato granting in part and denying in part 36 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2014)
June 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge William Alsup [denying 9 Motion to Dismiss]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2013)
May 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER ADVANCING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (6/6/2013 AT 8:00 AM) by Judge William Alsup [granting in part and denying in part 14 Stipulation]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2013)
April 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 7 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/16/12. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. The State of California Department of Highway Patrol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Summer Smith
Represented By: Susan Sher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The State of California Department of Highway Patrol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?