Genoa
Petitioner: Julius David Genoa
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 1:2015cv02459
Filed: June 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Eureka Office
County: San Luis Obispo
Presiding Judge: PSLC AGB
Presiding Judge: Nandor J. Vadas
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 11/17/15. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2015)
July 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITH LEAVE TO AMEND re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Julius David Genoa. Signed by Judge James Donato on 7/29/15. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2015)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Genoa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Julius David Genoa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?