Lopez v. Warden, San Quentin Prison et al
| Gustavo Colin Lopez |
| Director, Immigration and Customs Department, Homeland Security, Warden, San Quentin Prison and Sheriff, Santa Clara County County Jail |
| 1:2019cv04108 |
| July 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC AGB |
| Robert M Illman |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Gustavo Colin Lopez.. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2019) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gustavo Colin Lopez. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2019) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2019) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 8/23/2019. (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Director, Immigration and Customs Department, Homeland Security, Sheriff, Santa Clara County County Jail, Warden, San Quentin Prison (Filing fee IFPP). Filed byGustavo Colin Lopez. Consent/Declination due by 8/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
