Sampson-Swartz v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Hailey Sampson-Swartz
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 1:2022cv02970
Filed: May 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Robert M Illman
Referring Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman for all further proceedings. Judge Richard Seeborg no longer assigned to case,. Signed by Clerk on 6/30/22. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2022)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/30/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2022)
June 30, 2022 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Hailey Sampson-Swartz.. (Herrera, Betty) (Filed on 6/30/2022)
June 29, 2022 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Kilolo Kijakazi.. (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar) (Filed on 6/29/2022)
May 25, 2022 Filing 8 Acknowledgment of Receipt re #7 Summons Issued. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2022)
May 24, 2022 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2022)
May 24, 2022 summons issued #7 , waiver of service of summons, and copies of re #1 , re #5 & re #6 emailed to Social Security Administration and the United States Attorney's Office (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2022)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg GRANTING #2 AND #3 PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2022)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER (Social Security Review Action) (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2022)
May 19, 2022 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022)
May 19, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed in forma pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Hailey Sampson-Swartz. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022)
May 19, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Hailey Sampson-Swartz. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022)
May 19, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (no process) against Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, (Filing Fee: ifpp entered 5/19/2022). Filed by Hailey Sampson-Swartz.(Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet, #(2) Envelope) (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sampson-Swartz v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hailey Sampson-Swartz
Represented By: Betty Herrera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: Oscar Gonzalez de Llano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?