Zurich American Insurance Company v. Norman Scott Farley et al
Zurich American Insurance Company, a New York corporation |
NORMAN SCOTT FARLEY, an individual and DBA KERNEN CONSTRUCTION, KURT EDWARD KERNEN, an individual and DBA KERNEN CONSTRUCTION and Does 1 to 10, inclusive |
1:2022cv03903 |
July 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Insurance |
12 U.S.C. ยง 635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Zurich American Insurance Company, a New York corporation identifying Corporate Parent Zurich Insurance Company Ltd., a Swiss corporation, Corporate Parent Zurich Insurance Group Ltd, a Swiss corporation, Corporate Parent Zurich Holding Company of America, Inc., a Delaware corporation for Zurich American Insurance Company, a New York corporation. re #1 Complaint (Horton, Lincoln) (Filed on 7/1/2022) |
Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Zurich American Insurance Company, a New York corporation . (Horton, Lincoln) (Filed on 7/1/2022) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Horton, Lincoln) (Filed on 7/1/2022) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17318087.). Filed byZurich American Insurance Company, a New York corporation. (Horton, Lincoln) (Filed on 7/1/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.