Santos v. County of Humboldt
| Steven A. Santos |
| County of Humboldt |
| 1:2022cv07485 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Robert M Illman |
| American with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint against All Defendants. Filed bySteven A. Santos. (Santos, Steven) (Filed on 1/26/2023) |
| Filing 10 Proposed Order re #8 MOTION to Dismiss by County of Humboldt. (Burch, Dana) (Filed on 1/5/2023) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by County of Humboldt.. (Burch, Dana) (Filed on 1/5/2023) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by County of Humboldt. Motion Hearing set for 2/14/2023 11:00 AM in McKinleyville, Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman. Responses due by 1/19/2023. Replies due by 1/26/2023. (Burch, Dana) (Filed on 1/5/2023) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Steven A. Santos.. (Santos, Steven) (Filed on 12/21/2022) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Steven A. Santos (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Received Stamped Cover Page)(Santos, Steven) (Filed on 12/19/2022) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to County of Humboldt. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2022) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2022) |
| Filing 3 Letter from Steven A. Santos re Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2022) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 2/21/202 3. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/28/2023 02:00 PM in McKinleyville. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against County of Humboldt (Filing fee $ 402 #3461162264.). Filed bySteven A. Santos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt $402)(msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Santos v. County of Humboldt | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven A. Santos | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: County of Humboldt | |
| Represented By: | Dana Leigh Burch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
