Mitcham v. Calderon, et al
| Stephen Louis Mitcham |
| Jeanne Woodford, Jill Brown, Robert L. Ayers and Robert K Wong |
| Habeas Corpus Resource Center and California Appellate Project |
| 3:1997cv03825 |
| August 10, 1994 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Marin |
| Vaughn R. Walker |
| Death Penalty |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
381
ORDER GRANTING 380 MOTION for Extension of Time to File SURREPLY. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/24/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011)
|
|
Filing
379
ORDER Regarding Application of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) to Claim D. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on October 4, 2011. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2011)
|
|
Filing
369
ORDER Granting Briefing Schedule re 368 Joint Case Management Statement filed by Vince Cullen. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/16/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2011)
|
|
Filing
356
ORDER. Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 11/5/2010. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2010)
|
|
Filing
351
ORDER REGARDING CLAIM D. Because petitioner failed to object to the prosecutor's exercise of peremptory challenges at trial, he has failed to preserve his Batson claim for review on federal habeas. Accordingly, summary judgment on claim D, with the exception of its ineffective assistance of counsel subclaim, is granted. Petitioner's surreply and respondent's response relating to claim D should only address the ineffective assistance subclaim. Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 8/25/2010. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2010)
|
|
Filing
338
STIPULATION AND ORDER Modifying Filing Dates (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2008)
|
|
Filing
335
ORDER re 334 Stipulation filed by Stephen Louis Mitcham. Signed by Judge Vaughn R. Walker on 9/19/2008. (gsa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
