USA v. Davis

Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Tucker H. Davis
Case Number: 3:1998cv03667
Filed: November 5, 2009
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: Magistrate Judge
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery Student Loan
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Recovery of Debt to US

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 28, 2010 24 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATED GARNISHMENT ORDER re 23 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 4/28/2010. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2010)
November 5, 2009 17 Opinion or Order of the Court Writ of Continuing Garnishment issued against Tucker H. Davis aka Davis H. Tucker (Defendant), and Concord Garden Equipment Company (Garnishee)(ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2009)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Represented By: Michael Cosentino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tucker H. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?