USA v. Hodges
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Nathelia Hodges
Case Number: 3:2001cv02553
Filed: November 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: Magistrate Judge
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery Student Loan
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Default of Student Loan

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 WRIT OF GARNISHMENT issued (ga, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2011)
November 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Writ of Continuing Garnishment issued against Nathelia Hodges (Defendant) and Alameda County Medical Center (Garnishee). (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Hodges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Represented By: Michael Cosentino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nathelia Hodges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?