Greene v. Carey

Case Number: 3:2005cv03433
Filed: August 24, 2005
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 10, 2009 28 Opinion or Order of the Court CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of K. Powers, Tom L. Carey against Philip Jason Greene. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby DENIED. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2009)
April 19, 2007 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING 7 MOTION TO LIFT STAY, FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETITION, AND TO CHANGE RESPONDENT; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Clerk of the Court shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order and the January 22, 2007 amended petition, along with all attachments thereto, upon respondent and respondent's attorney, the Attorney General for the State of California. Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on petitioner, within 90 days of the date this order is filed, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted based on claims in the petition. IT IS SO ORDERED Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 19, 2007. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2007) Modified on 4/20/2007 (aaa, Court Staff).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greene v. Carey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?