People of the States of California et al v. United States Department of Agriculture, et al
3:2005cv03508 |
August 30, 2005 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
Environmental Matters |
42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 295 STIPULATION AND ORDER on Attorneys' Fees & Costs re 294 Stipulation Signed by Mag. Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 2/1/2010. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2010) |
Filing 293 STIPULATION AND ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 12/17/2009 to Stay Briefing & Submission of Additional Materials Re Application for Attorney's Fees & Expenses re 292 Stipulation. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2009) |
Filing 283 ORDER PARTIALLY STAYING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN THE INTERESTS OF COMITY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 62(c) by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granting in part and denying in part 257 Motion ; denying 260 Motion to Stay (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: People of the States of California et al v. United States Department of Agriculture, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.