Osanitsch v. Marconi PLC
| 3:2005cv03988 |
| October 3, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Charles R. Breyer |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
ORDER for Dismissal with prejudice re 157 Stipulation filed by Marconi PLC. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/22/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2010)
|
|
Filing
152
ORDER to continue hearing on motion re 151 Stipulation filed by Marconi PLC, Telent Ltd., Marconi Communications, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 151 Stipulation, 126 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Motion Hearing set for 5/28/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/29/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2010)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER to continue hearing re 149 Stipulation filed by Marconi PLC, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 149 Stipulation, 126 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Motion Hearing set for 4/30/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/9/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2010)
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER re 146 Stipulation filed by Marconi PLC, Telent Ltd., Marconi Communications, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 146 Stipulation, 126 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Motion Hearing reset for 4/9/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/11/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2010)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER to continue hearing re 128 Stipulation filed by John Osanitsch, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 128 Stipulation, 126 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Motion Hearing set for 3/12/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/21/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2010)
|
|
Filing
124
JUDGMENT in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on December 22, 2009. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2009) Modified on 12/23/2009 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 86 Motion for Summary Judgment (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2009)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer finding as moot 112 Motion to Shorten Time; granting 114 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2009)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting in part and denying in part as moot 88 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2009)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER Granting re 94 Stipulation To Continue Hearing on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Marconi PLC, John Osanitsch Motion Hearing set for 11/6/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/1/09. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2009)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER extending time to answer re 70 Stipulation filed by Marconi PLC. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/28/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2009)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER. Amended complaint due 12/19/08. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2008) Modified on 11/17/2008 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Osanitsch v. Marconi PLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
