Marcelja v. Todd Shipyards Corporation et al
| 3:2005cv04347 |
| October 25, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' DISMISSAL OF HEIR RICHARD MARCELJA, JR., ONLY, WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 15, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 27, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2012)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 24, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2012)
|
|
Filing
28
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER, Case reopened. IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.VI) MDL No. 875. Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi, Clerk of the Panel on 7/5/12. (aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marcelja v. Todd Shipyards Corporation et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
