Chacon v. Gallian et al
3:2005cv04880 |
November 29, 2005 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Susan Illston |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 JUDGMENT: (1) In favor of plaintiff and against defendants Michelle Edwards, Victor Gorospe, and Robert Munoz on the negligence claim, (2) in favor of defendant Lloyd Goulter on the negligence claim, (3) in favor of defendants Michelle Edwards, Victor Gorospe, Robert Munoz, and Lloyd Gouleter on the Eighth Amendment claim, and (4) dismissing all other defendants. Signed by Judge Susan Illston. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2008) |
Filing 67 ORDER by Judge Illston granting 65 Ex Parte Application (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2008) |
Filing 59 ORDER granting Ms. Graham to appear by phone (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2008) |
Filing 56 ORDER for Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum. Signed by Judge Illston on 11/20/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2008) |
Filing 55 Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding; case did not settle. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 11/12/08. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chacon v. Gallian et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.