Cody v. General Electric Company
Case Number: 3:2006cv00843
Filed: February 8, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: James Larson
Nature of Suit: P.I. : Asbestos
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER DISMISSING CASE re Voluntary Dismissal Of Entire Action, Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/26/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2016)
July 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER TO DEFENDANT GENERAL ELECTRIC AND PLAINTIFFS REGARDING STATUS OF SETTLEMENTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 7/1/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2016)
September 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/25/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2012)
August 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER, (MDL 875) by MDL Panel remanding case back to the Northern District of California; Case reopened. (ga, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cody v. General Electric Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?