Mussen v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Northern District Mussen v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. et al

Mussen v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. et al

Case Number:	3:2006cv01000
Filed:	February 14, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office:	San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge:	Marilyn H. Patel
Nature of Suit:	Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 28, 2011	Filing 45 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 44 Stipulation filed by Sharon Mussen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/28/11. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2011)
August 11, 2011	Filing 38 ORDER RE STANDARD OF REVIEW: The court finds that the plan in this case unambiguously vests discretionary authority in the Plan to interpret the terms of the plan and make final benefit determinations. Therefore, the abuse of discretion standard of review applies in this case. If plaintiff can establish that there are other factors or considerations, such as those enumerated above, that the court must take into account in its review, plaintiff may bring them forward at the time of review of the Plans decision; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 8/11/2011. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2011)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 28, 2011

Filing 45 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 44 Stipulation filed by Sharon Mussen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/28/11. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2011)

August 11, 2011

Filing 38 ORDER RE STANDARD OF REVIEW: The court finds that the plan in this case unambiguously vests discretionary authority in the Plan to interpret the terms of the plan and make final benefit determinations. Therefore, the abuse of discretion standard of review applies in this case. If plaintiff can establish that there are other factors or considerations, such as those enumerated above, that the court must take into account in its review, plaintiff may bring them forward at the time of review of the Plans decision; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 8/11/2011. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2011)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mussen v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?