Nakagawa v. The Regents of the University of California et al
3:2006cv02066 |
March 20, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Susan Illston |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Within 90 days from the date hereof, that settlement has not in fact occurred, the foregoing order shall be vacated and this causes shall worthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Illston on 10/9/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2008) |
Filing 92 ORDER - Notice and Order Setting Further Settlement Conference. Further Settlement Conference set for 10/21/2008 09:30 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/10/2008. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2008) |
Filing 89 ORDER adjusting litigation schedule. Signed by Judge Illston on 9/3/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2008) |
Filing 87 ORDER - Notice of Settlement Conference and Settlement Conference Order. Settlement Conference set for 9/9/2008 09:30 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/2/2008. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nakagawa v. The Regents of the University of California et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.