Thomas v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
Case Number: 3:2006cv02705
Filed: April 20, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: Martin J. Jenkins
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 Labor Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER to dismiss with prejudice (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2010)
October 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER granting substitution (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2009)
August 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with right to revive. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2009)
April 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER continuing cmc to 8/14/09 @ 2:30 p.m.. Signed by Judge Illston on 4/17/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2009)
January 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER continuing cmc to 3/13/09. Signed by Judge Illston on 1/15/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2009)
November 4, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER continuing cmc to 1/16/09 re 64 . (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2008)
September 29, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting withdrawal of attorney re 61 . Signed by Judge Illston on 9/29/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?