Botkin et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
3:2006cv02862 |
April 28, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Charles R. Breyer |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Paul Bynum and David Payne terminated.Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/13/09. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2009) |
Filing 15 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re 14 Stipulation filed by Pfizer, Inc., Richard A. Clarke, Jr, Danny Crosslin, Lawanna Ferguson, Bobbie F. Hiney, Cynthia Koontz, Phillip Andrew Koontz, Priscilla Ashley Koontz, Haven L. McClaren, Clara M. Page, Michael Page, Stacy Page, Dorothy Shaw, Pauline Botkin and Debbie Page Brown terminated.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/16/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2009) |
Filing 13 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 9 Motion to Set Aside Judgment (Bynum). (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2009) |
Filing 12 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 8 Motion for Leave to File. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Botkin et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.