Thomas v. Ponder et al
| 3:2006cv03581 |
| June 5, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
NOTIFICATION OF SATISFACTION OF SETTLEMENT; AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 20, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2012)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed co nsideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 13, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2012)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER returning document to Plaintiff entered by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 6/5/12. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2012)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER IN ADVANCE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on May 30, 2012. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2012)
|
|
Filing
121
WRIT of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued for presence of Plaintiff at settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 5/11/2012. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2012)
|
|
Filing
119
PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 3/26/12. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2012)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER GRANTING 95 DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; DENYING 93 MOTION FOR TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 31, 2011. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2011)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER DENYING 84 MOTION FOR TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR FILING OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON GROUNDS OF QUALILFIED IMMUNITY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 1, 2011. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2011)
|
|
Filing
83
WRIT of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued for presence of Plaintiff at settlement conference on March 22, 2011, at Solano State Prison. Signed by Judge Vadas on 2/24/2011. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2011)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER REOPENING CASE; REFERRING CASE FOR SETTLEMENT PROCEEDINGS; DENYING 73 MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 3, 2011. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2011)
|
|
Filing
63
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of G. Ponder, M. J. Kircher, M. S. Evans against Otis Michael Thomas. 1. Defendants motion for summary judgment are hereby GRANTED and judgment shall be entered in favor of each of the defendants.2. Plaintiffs motions for judicial notice are hereby DENIED (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2009)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER DENYING 47 53 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR COURT TO OBTAIN AND REVIEW TRANSCRIPT OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION; SETTING NEW BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 30, 2008. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thomas v. Ponder et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
