Lackey et al v. Infinity Broadcasting Corporation et al
3:2006cv03987 |
June 27, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Marilyn H. Patel |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 179 STIPULATION AND ORDER dismissing action with prejudice; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 9/11/2009. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2009) |
Filing 177 ORDER (NINETY-DAY CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL): Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 3/25/2009. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2009) |
Filing 174 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PRETRIAL FILINGS; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 12/22/2008. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2008) |
Filing 167 STIPULATION AND ORDER: Status conference set for 10/6/2008 at 3:00 pm; Jury Trial reset for 4/14/2009 08:30 AM; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 9/17/2008. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2008) |
Filing 109 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel denying 42 PLAINTIFF'S Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 58 DEFENDANTS' Motion for Summary Judgment (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lackey et al v. Infinity Broadcasting Corporation et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.