Simpson v. McNack et al
3:2006cv04837 |
August 10, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Maxine M. Chesney |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 208 STIPULATION AND ORDER of dismissal re 207 Stipulation filed by Gordon Simpson. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/12/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2010) |
Filing 206 ORDER re 205 Notice of Withdrawal of Motions #184, 193 and 196 filed by Stanley A. Nguyen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/26/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2010) |
Filing 204 STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING JURY VERDICT, JUDGMENT AND SPECIAL VERDICT FINDINGS FROM TRIAL re 203 Stipulation filed by Stanley A. Nguyen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/22/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2010) |
Filing 188 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO MOVE AND/OR APPLY FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS re 187 Stipulation filed by Gordon Simpson. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/27/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2010) |
Filing 177 FINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2010) |
Filing 175 COURT'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM (May 12, 2010). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2010) |
Filing 173 JURY INSTRUCTIONS (May 11, 2010). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2010) |
Filing 170 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Re 155 168 Defendants' Motions in Limine and 169 Defendants' Objections to Plaintiff's Exhibits. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2010) |
Filing 165 ORDER DIRECTING JURY COMMISSIONER TO FURNISH DAILY REFRESHMENTS. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/30/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2010) |
Filing 140 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFS. McNACK, ZENDEJAS AND BART ONLY re 139 Stipulation filed by Zendejas, Bay Area Rapid Transit District, A. McNack. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/12/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2010) |
Filing 136 ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/4/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2010) |
Filing 130 ORDER APPOINTING LIMITED SCOPE COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/18/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2009) |
Filing 126 AMENDED ORDER re 125 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (page 2 paragraph 3 changed from 2009 to 2010). Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/12/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2009) |
Filing 118 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 109 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2009) |
Filing 94 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 90 Plaintiff's Attorney's Motion to Withdraw. Attorney Daniel Ralph Richardson terminated effective 6/26/2009. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2009) Modified on 5/29/2009 (emcsec, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 92 ORDER Sealing Plaintiff's Response to Counsel's Motion to Withdraw. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/27/2009. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2009) |
Filing 78 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 76 Stipulation filed by Zendejas, Bay Area Rapid Transit District, A. McNack. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/3/08. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Simpson v. McNack et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.