Champagne et al v. The City and County of San Francisco et al
| 3:2006cv05425 |
| September 1, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
ORDER GRANTING: 145 MOTION FOR ORDER TO SET ASIDE ORDER AND ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on September 30, 2015. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2015)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White REJECTING Recommendation and GRANTING 78 Motion for Attorney Fees. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2008)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/22/08. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2008)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER REFERRING DISCOVERY DISPUTE AND ALL FURTHER DISCOVERY TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE 42 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages in Parties' Joint Letter Brief Concnering Discovery Issues filed by Gary A. Champagne. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/8/08. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Champagne et al v. The City and County of San Francisco et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
