Valladon v. City of Oakland
Case Number: 3:2006cv07478
Filed: December 6, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: Susan Illston
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 379 ORDER granting substitution (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2010)
November 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 371 ORDER pretrial set 3/16/10 and trial set 3/22/10 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2009)
October 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 366 ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 165 , 168 , 180 , 345 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2009)
August 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 337 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 328 , 162 , 114 , 177 , 188 , 196 , 199 , 190 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2009)
July 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 309 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON SUBGROUP Q re 118 .(SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2009)
July 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 308 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE, GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCEED THE PAGE LIMIT, and RESCHEDULING MOTION HEARING. 297 , 299 , 303 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2009)
July 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 283 ORDER vacating motion hearing and dismissl w/prejudice Subgroups H, I, J, K, L, & M (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2009)
June 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 281 ORDER re: briefing schedule (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2009)
April 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 214 ORDER continuing motions- Correct Version (trial date remains as previously scheduled). Signed by Judge Illston on 4/21/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2009)
April 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 210 CLERK FILED THE WRONG ORDER... THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT IS FILED IN ERROR ORDER continuing motions #114, #118 and #120 to 5/22/09. Signed by Judge Illston on 4/21/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2009) Modified on 4/23/2009 (ts, COURT STAFF).
April 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 158 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' DISCOVERY MOTION (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2009)
April 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 153 ORDER re 152 .(ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2009)
April 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 151 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AMEND EXPERT DISCLOSURES (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2009)
March 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 142 ORDER continuing 4/24/09 motions to 5/1/09.. Signed by Judge Illston on 3/13/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2009)
March 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 139 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STRIKE AND EXCLUDE EXPERT OPINION OF JUDITH E. KRAMER re 133 , 136 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2009)
February 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' SCHEDULING REQUEST (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2009)
December 29, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' DISCOVERY MOTION (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2008)
November 12, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER adjusting litigation schedule. (see order for changes). Signed by Judge Illston on 11/11/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2008)
November 4, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER re: expert discovery re 103 (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valladon v. City of Oakland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?