Mann v. Lee et al
| Jesse Mann |
| C. Lee, Bowman and Milner |
| 3:2007cv00781 |
| February 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Monterey |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER DENYING 41 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DISCOVERY; GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; SCHEDULING REPLY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 22, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2009)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER GRANTING 37 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; DENYING 36 MOTION FOR HEARING ON ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 24, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2009)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING 29 DEFENDANTS' FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 26, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2009)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER DENYING 21 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; DENYING 27 MOTION TO APPOINT PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR OR ORDER PERSONAL SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS; DIRECTING DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL TO SECURE WAIVERS OF SERVICE FROM DEFENDANTS AND FILE APPEARANCE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 26, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
