McCormick v. Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company

Plaintiff: John McCormick
Defendant: Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2007cv01711
Filed: March 26, 2007
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 28, 2007 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why action should not be remanded. Defendant's Show Cause Response due by 4/6/2007; plaintiff's reply due by 4/20/07. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 3/28/2007. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2007)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCormick v. Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company
Represented By: John Rearden Bamford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John McCormick
Represented By: J. Edward Kerley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?