Pena v. Tilton

Petitioner: Sergio Octavio Pena
Respondent: James E. Tilton
Case Number: 3:2007cv02119
Filed: April 16, 2007
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Phyllis J. Hamilton
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 30, 2010 17 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 11/30/10. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2010)
April 23, 2007 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting 2 Motion; administrative closure (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2007)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pena v. Tilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sergio Octavio Pena
Represented By: Lazuli Mariah Whitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James E. Tilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?