Cook et al v. USAA General Indemnity Company
| Stefanie Cook and Nathaniel Cook |
| USAA General Indemnity Company |
| 3:2007cv04042 |
| August 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Marin |
| Joseph C. Spero |
| Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4000 National Flood Insurance Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER allowing equipment into the Courtroom for trial. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 4/23/09. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2009)
|
|
Filing
50
COURT TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 2/19/09. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2009)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER re Case Referred to Magistrate Judge for Settlement Settlement Conference set for 3/13/2009 10:00 AM.. Signed by Judge MARIA-ELENA JAMES on 2/12/09. (bjt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2009)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting 21 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 22 Motion to Quash; denying 23 Motion for Summary Judgment (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2008)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER Discovery due by 11/28/2008. Jury Trial set for 3/9/2009 09:30 AM. Motion Hearing set for 1/23/2009 10:00 AM. Pretrial Conference set for 2/20/2009 10:00 AM.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 10/1/08. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
