Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W. et al v. Nuvelo Inc. et al
| Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W. and Juan Pablo Cabrera |
| Nuvelo Inc., Ted W. Love, Gary S. Titus and Shelly D. Guyer |
| The Lidard Group and The Petronis Group |
| 3:2007cv04056 |
| August 8, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Martin J. Jenkins |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
175
ORDER cancelling hearing on unopposed motion for distribution of settlement and taking the motion on the papers re 173 Stipulation, filed by Todd A. and Amy A. Stephens, Frank C. and Patricia A. Petronis, Juan Pablo Cabrera. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/13/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2012)
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 160 Motion for Attorney Fees (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2011)
|
|
Filing
167
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES AND FOR COSTS AND EXPENSES TO SETTLEMENT CLASS REPRESENTATIVES. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on June 20, 2011. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2011)
|
|
Filing
154
ORDER Continuing Stay of Litigation to Finalize Settlement Documents (2/24/2011) re 153 Stipulation filed by Nuvelo Inc., Case stayed.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/10/2011. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2011)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER re 149 Stipulation filed by Gary S. Titus, Ted W. Love, Nuvelo Inc., Michael D Levy. (vrwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2011)
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER. The court finds that a brief stay of its 1/14 order is appropriate. Defendants shall provide the documents and briefing requested in the 1/14 order no later than 1/26/2011. Should the parties conclude the settlement process prior to that time, defendants may request a further stay. (vrwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2011).
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER (vrwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2011)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER. The parties shall respond to this discovery-related order on or before November 4, 2010. (vrwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2010).
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER. On or before October 4, 2010, plaintiffs shall file a letter brief in response to defendants' letter of September 27, 2010. (vrwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2010).
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER (vrwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2010).
|
|
Filing
126
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES re 125 filed by Nuvelo Inc. The deadline for Defendants to produce all documents in response to document requests outstanding as of 3/25/2010 shall be extended to 7/30/2010. The deadlines for Lead Plaintif f to serve Identification Interrogatories, for Defendants to file responses thereto, and for Lead Plaintiff to serve FRCP 30(b)(6) deposition notices shall each be extended by 60 days. The parties shall work in good faith to resolve any outstanding discovery disputes in a manner that permits discovery necessary to mediation, to be produced in a timely manner, and any delay in bringing such disputes to the attention of the Court until after the mediation shall not operate to waive or otherwise p rejudice the rights of the moving party to obtain the discovery requested. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file a motion for class certification shall be extended sixty days, to 11/15/2010. The hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for class certification shall be rescheduled to 1/27/2011 at 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 7/7/2010. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2010)
|
|
Filing
104
STIPULATION AND ORDER setting Further Case Management Conference for 10/15/2009 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Vaughn R. Walker on 09/30/09. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2009)
|
|
Filing
88
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re doc 86 filed by Todd A. and Amy A. Stephens, Frank C. and Patricia A. Petronis, Juan Pablo Cabrera. Lead Plaintiffs have until 5/15/2009 to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. Defendants shall have through and including 6/10/2009 to file a reply brief. Signed by Chief Judge Vaughn RWalker on 5/13/2009. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2009)
|
|
Filing
83
STIPULATION AND ORDER. Lead Plaintiffs shall have through and including 5/13/2009 to file an opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss. Defendants shall have through and including 6/8/2009 to file a reply brief Doc re 82 filed by Nuvelo Inc. The hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss was noticed for 6/25/2009 at 2:30 PM. Signed by Chief Judge Vaughn R Walker on 3/31/2009. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2009)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT re [Doc #73] Stipulation filed by Nuvelo Inc. Plaintiffs shall have through and including 1/23/2009 to file the Amended Consolidated Complaint. Defendants shall have through and including 3/24/2009 to respond to the Amended Consolidated Complaint. Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 1/9/2009. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2009)
|
|
Filing
71
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR LEAD PLAINTIFFS TO FILE CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT until 1/14/2009. Signed by Chief Judge Vaughn R Walker on 12/12/2008. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2008)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER Granting [doc #34] Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amended consolidated complaint not later than 12/31/2008. (vrwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2008).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
