Halteh v. City of South San Francisco et al
Raad Halteh |
City of South San Francisco, Mark Raffaelli, Mike Remedios and Ken Checuti |
3:2007cv05130 |
October 5, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Mateo |
Martin J. Jenkins |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 16, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2009) |
Filing 43 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman finding as moot 30 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 30 Motion for Discovery (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2008) |
Filing 42 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER. Signed by Judge James Larson on 12/16/08. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2008) |
Filing 40 BRIEFING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/25/2008. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2008) |
Filing 34 INITIAL DISCOVERY ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/19/2008. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2008) |
Filing 33 ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 14, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2008) |
Filing 29 AMENDED PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 9/19/2008. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.