Insurance Corporation of New York v. H&H Plastering Inc. et al
Insurance Corporation of New York |
H&H Plastering Inc. and Concrete Shell Structures Inc. |
3:2007cv05214 |
October 11, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
James Larson |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 ORDER DENYING FURTHER EXTENSION OF STAY. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 4, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2010) |
Filing 98 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF STAY. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 1, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2010) |
Filing 96 ORDER GRANTING STAY FOR 60 DAYS. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 4, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2010) |
Filing 87 REMINDER NOTICE OF UPCOMING TRIAL AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 23, 2009. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2009) |
Filing 85 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO FILE STATUS UPDATE. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 4, 2009. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2009) |
Filing 83 ORDER RE CASE STATUS. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 1, 2009. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2009) |
Filing 79 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.