Santos v. Merritt College et al
| Elisabeth Santos |
| Merritt College and Shirley Mack |
| 3:2007cv05227 |
| October 12, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 84 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2009)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER vacating trial date and setting cmc re 105 Stipulation filed by Shirley Mack, Peralta Community College. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/12/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2009)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER VACATING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE re 100 Stipulation filed by Merritt College, Shirley Mack, Peralta Community College. Signed by Judge James Larson on 10/6/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2009)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER ADVANCING THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DATE FROM OCTOBER 23, 2009 TO OCTOBER 21, 2009 AT 2:00PM. Signed by Judge James Larson on 8/7/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2009)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER re 70 Joint Letter of May 19, 2009. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/26/2009. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2009)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/14/2008. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
