Berger et al v. Seyfarth Shaw, LLP et al
| Richard W. Berger and Brant W. Berger |
| Seyfarth Shaw, LLP, Jack L. Slobodin, Burnett, Burnett & Allen and Douglas B. Allen |
| 3:2007cv05279 |
| October 17, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Cruz |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Trademark Infringement |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
ORDER GRANTING 156 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/13/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2009)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER GRANTING 154 Stipulation filed by Richard W. Berger, Brant W. Berger AND FINDING AS MOOT 152 Ex Parte Application for Administrative Relief for Continuance of Last Date to File Dismissal of Case with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on October 2, 2009. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2009)
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER GRANTING 144 Stipulation Vacating September 18, 2009 Further Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/10/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2009) Modified on 8/10/2009 (jjo, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
142
DISCOVERY ORDER re 141 Letter filed by Richard W. Berger, Brant W. Berger. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/31/2009. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2009)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS AND VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/2/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2009)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTES re 121 Letter filed by Richard W. Berger, Brant W. Berger, 134 Letter filed by Jack L. Slobodin, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/25/2009. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2009)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER GRANTING 131 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/22/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2009)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER RE: DOCUMENTS PRODUCED TO THE COURT FOR IN CAMERA. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 12/5/08. (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2008)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER GRANTING 125 Stipulation TO FILE DEFENDANTS SEYFARTH SHAW LLP'S AND JACK SLOBODIN'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/3/08. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2008)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER RE: PRIVILEGE re 122 Order. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/21/08. (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2008)
|
|
Filing
122
SECOND ORDER GRANTING OBJECTIONS, REVERSING DISCOVERY ORDER AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/14/08. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2008)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS AN OPPORTUNITY TO FILE RESPONSIVE BRIEF. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/22/08. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2008)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER GRANTING 114 Objection filed by Seyfarth Shaw, LLP, REVERSING AND REMANDING 109 Order. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on September 19, 2008. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2008)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER re 108 Order; AMENDING ORDER IN DOCKET #108 TO ADD SIGNATURE. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 9/5/08. (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2008)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS re 102 Letter, filed by Jack L. Slobodin, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP. Signed by Judge Maria-Elana James on 9/3/08. (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
