Goos v. Shell Oil Company
| Carol A. Goos |
| Shell Oil Company |
| 3:2007cv06130 |
| December 4, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Solano |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
231
JUDGMENT in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on April 15, 2010. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2010) Modified on 4/16/2010 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
221
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 220 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2010)
|
|
Filing
205
ORDER to allow entry of electronic equipment re 203 Notice (Other) filed by Carol A. Goos. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/30/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2010)
|
|
Filing
195
ORDER re 147 Stipulation filed by Shell Oil Company. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/25/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2010)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER by Judge Laporte granting in part and denying in part 93 Motion for Protective Order Re: Deposition of Carol Goos; granting in part and denying in part 95 Motion for Protective Order Re: Deposition of Rodger Schuester; finding as moot 97 request to vacate deposition; denying 126 Motion to Shorten Time (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2010)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER re 108 Motion for Trial Continuance. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on March 16, 2010. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2010) Modified on 3/17/2010 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER re 81 Stipulation filed by Carol A. Goos, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 81 Stipulation, 69 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 12/18/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/16/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2009)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER to continue hearing re 51 Stipulation filed by Carol A. Goos, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 51 Stipulation, 29 First MOTION for Summary Judgment , Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication, 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Partia l) MOTION for Summary Judgment (Partial) MOTION for Summary Judgment (Partial) MOTION for Summary Judgment (Partial). Motion Hearing set for 6/26/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/7/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Goos v. Shell Oil Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carol A. Goos | |
| Represented By: | Randal M. Barnum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Shell Oil Company | |
| Represented By: | Ramona Kaur Tumber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
